Prof. Dr. Thorsten Jungmann (last updated 2025-12-07)
Relates to EE1-04 Resistance
Task
A photovoltaic system on a flat roof generates a direct current of at full load and a voltage of . The copper electric line from the PV generator to the inverter in the basement has a one-way length of .
The installer plans to use a cable with a cross-section of .
Boundary conditions:
- The resistivity of the copper electric line at is
- The temperature coefficient of copper:
- In summer, the cable temperature on the roof can reach
- The maximum permissible voltage drop on the DC side is of the system voltage
a) Calculate the conductor resistance at (take the outgoing and return conductors into account).
b) Calculate the conductor resistance at the maximum operating temperature of .
c) Determine the voltage drop and the power loss in the electric line at .
d) Check whether the planned cable cross-section complies with the limit. If not, calculate the minimum required cross-section.
e) What efficiency results for the transmission of electricity via the electric line?
Solution
a)
b)
c) (),
d) Limit just met; with reserve:
e)
Solution
Given
Given explicitly:
- Operating current:
- DC voltage:
- One-way cable length: → total length:
- Planned cross-section:
- Resistivity of copper:
- Temperature coefficient of copper:
- Maximum operating temperature:
- Maximum permissible voltage drop: of
Known:
- Conductor resistance:
- Temperature dependence:
- Voltage drop:
- Power loss:
- Efficiency:
where:
- is the resistance in ohms ()
- is the resistivity in
- is the total length (outgoing and return conductors) in metres ()
- is the cross-sectional area in square millimetres ()
- is the temperature coefficient at in
- is the temperature difference in kelvins ()
- is the voltage drop in volts ()
- is the power loss in watts ()
- is the efficiency (dimensionless)
Required
a) Conductor resistance at
b) Conductor resistance at
c) Voltage drop and power loss at
d) Check of the limit and, if necessary, minimum cross-section
e) Efficiency of the transmission of electricity
a) Conductor resistance at 20 °C
The total length (outgoing and return conductors):
The conductor resistance at :
b) Conductor resistance at 70 °C
The temperature difference is:
The temperature-corrected resistance:
Increase in resistance due to temperature
The resistance increases by as a result of the heating. This is significant and must be taken into account when dimensioning the cable. Many installers forget the temperature correction and therefore underestimate the voltage drop during summer operation.
c) Voltage drop and power loss at 70 °C
Voltage drop (German: Spannungsfall):
Relative voltage drop:
Power loss (German: Verlustleistung):
Check via :
✔
d) Checking the 2 % limit
Maximum permissible voltage drop:
Comparison:
At , the voltage drop lies just within the limit. However, there is practically no reserve.
Recommendation for the minimum cross-section with reserve:
For a target value of (common in practice):
Maximum permissible resistance at :
Conversion back to :
Required minimum cross-section:
From the standard series, you choose the next larger cross-section:
Practical recommendation
Although the cross-section is sufficient by calculation, is advisable in practice:
- Reserve for ageing and contact resistances
- Safety on particularly hot summer days ()
- Reduced losses increase the annual yield of the system
- The additional costs for the thicker cable pay for themselves over the operating time
e) Efficiency of the transmission of electricity
Generated power (at the PV generator):
Usable power (at the inverter):
Efficiency (German: Wirkungsgrad):
Alternative calculation:
✔
Estimating annual losses
For a typical PV system with full-load hours per year, the energy loss in the electric line is:
At an assumed electricity price of , this corresponds to about per year. Investing in a larger cable cross-section can therefore pay off over the 20- to 25-year operating time of the system.
